Media & political elites remiss in misunderstanding the truths about Islamism & anti-Semitism

Why They Celebrate Murdering Children.  Islam is as Islam does.  
by Andrew McCarthy in National Review Online  March 16, 2011

Palestinians welcome news of slain family of Jews

Muslims are frequently found carrying out the Koranic directive to “strike terror into the hearts of the unbelievers.” Actually, make that the Koranic theme, so often is it reiterated in the scriptures devout Muslims take to be the verbatim commands of Allah. (See, e.g., Suras 3:151, 8:12–13, 8:60, 9:5, 33:25–27, 59:2–4, 59:13.) And that is beside the hadith, scriptures in which Mohammed, taken to be the perfect Muslim role model, boasts, “I have been made victorious with terror.” (Bukhari 4.52.220 — just scroll down from here, through the glories promised to Muslims who wage jihad against the infidels.  

Muslims, in fact, are more often exhorted by their scriptures to brutalize non-Muslims than Christians are urged by the gospels to love their enemies and turn the other cheek. Yet, though we assume the latter are meant to take the message to heart, we are somehow sure Islam doesn’t really mean what it says — that when Muslims strike terror into the hearts of the unbelievers, it must be Israel’s fault, or America’s, or something, anything, other than Islam, the only common denominator in these attacks. . . . 

Rep. Peter King is to be applauded for forcing Congress to notice the phenomenon we so gingerly call Muslim “radicalization.” The question that really begs for hearings, though, is why we continue pretending not to know what causes it.

Itamar massacre: the result of culture of hatred, by Fiamma Nirenstein

Israel buries Fogel family parents Rabbi Udi & Ruth and
their 3 children, Yoav,11, Elad, 4, and daughter 

Hadas, 3 months, slaughtered by Palestinian terrorists

Slain Family Laid to Rest in Jerusalem

. . . Responsibility for the attack is claimed by the “moderate” side of the Palestinian political spectrum, the Brigades of Al Aqsa, the armed branch of Fatah, founded by Marwan Barghouti. Word has it that a meeting has also been held in Khartoum by members of Hamas and sundry Muslim Brothers, attended by Palestinians, Egyptians, Tunisians and even English people: they supposedly coordinated a large-scale international plan for Islamic terrorist attacks to be headed by Iran, the primary target of which would be Israel.


The background to the attack carried out the other night is on one side that of the revolution occurring in the surrounding Arab countries, and on the other side that of the most traditional form of hatred. The leadership of Abu Mazen and Fayyad is in a state of alarm, which led both of them to adopt aggressive, unwavering attitudes toward Israel in a bid to win over the masses who are threatening their power on Internet and out in the streets. They call Abu Mazen the slave of Israel and of the Americans and their campaign has been dominated by the call for unity with Hamas. 


The social networks act as a sounding board, praising the “resistance” and rejecting any peace projects, including the largely unknown new interim project which Netanyahu intends presenting at Washington to facilitate a return to the negotiation table. At any rate, Abu Mazen and Fayyad have already said they are not interested. 


They also issued indignant denials of stories revealed in the "Palestinian papers", which actually only stated that negotiations were underway with Olmert’s government. Current opinion has it that to be a pure and real Palestinian, you cannot be involved in negotiations and therefore they deny any evidence, even of speaking with the Israeli. As a matter of fact, the Palestinians have no intention of negotiating for "two States for two people": to them, Palestine is a single entity that includes Israel.

Read more of "Itamar massacre: the result of culture of hatred" by Fiamma Nirenstein

Incitement against Jews rampant on Arab TV channels; a factor in Palestinian slaying of Jewish family

Let’s stop pretending by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik

Incitement is not just another issue to be negotiated over like borders, water and refugees; message of hate threatens peaceful solutions.

The Palestinian Authority and its leaders share the blame for the murders of those five Israelis from Itamar on Friday – including two children and an infant – along with the terrorists who committed them. It is the PA and its leaders who have prepared the ground for these murders with the incessant incitement to hatred and the glorification of violence and terror.

In spite of its conciliatory statements in English, the PA continues to use all the structures it controls to demonize Israelis and to promote violence. Terrorists are presented as heroes and role models for Palestinians, teaching that killing Israelis is a way to earn eternal fame.

Just two months ago, PA President Mahmoud Abbas sent a clear message of support for terror when he awarded $2000 to the family of a terrorist who attacked IDF soldiers. Last week, the PA’s official daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida announced a football tournament named after Wafa Idris, the first female Palestinian suicide bomber, and three weeks ago PA TV, which is under the direct control of Abbas’s office, broadcast videos glorifying the terrorist Habash Hanani, who in May 2002 entered Itamar and murdered three Israeli students. Twice the PA named summer camps after the terrorist Dalal Mughrabi, who in 1978 led the most deadly attack in Israel’s history in which 37 civilians were killed in a bus hijacking, both in 2008 and again this past summer.

Here is a video compilation of Muslim anti-Semitic incitement from various channels, including the PA.


As long as the Palestinian Authority continues to teach these messages, clearly there is no peace process.

It is incumbent on the international community to inform the Palestinian Authority that a condition for “working” with it, as Clinton stated, is that it erases the messages of hate and replaces them with peace promotion.

And until that time the international community must ostracize and isolate the Palestinian Authority, just as they do Hamas, and stop pretending there is a peace process.


(Video courtesy http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/  via Joniversity

Muslim-apologists scrape to discredit the Homeland Security hearing on domestic radicalization

Melvin Bledsoe at son Carlos's graduation before Islamism

"God help us, God help us!" pleaded Homeland Security Committee Hearing witness Melvin Bledsoe, the father of Muslim-radicalized, Memphis teen, Carlos Bledsoe, accused of murdering one U.S. soldier and wounding another in attacking an Arkansas military-recruiting office.

Yesterday, as the US House Committee on Homeland Security held a hearing to expose Islamic radicalization within America's mosques (which disproportionately affects Jews and Jewish targets, from the terror attacks at the El Al counter at L.A.X., to the Seattle Jewish Community Center shootings) both leftists in the hearing as well as the Muslim Brotherhood-influenced media commotion surrounding it- attempted to de-rail the message exposing anti-Semitic, Saudi Wahabist extremism hijacking Islamic institutions and teachings.

Witnesses at Homeland Security Committee hearing on
Muslim radicalization.  From right L.A. Sheriff Lee Baca;
 radicalized Somali-American's uncle Abdirizak Bihi;
father of  Carlos, a radicalized Tennesean Mr. Melvin
 Bledsoe; AFDI's Dr. Zuhdi Jasser

DemoCast compiles relevant commentary regarding the leftist circus made of Rep. Peter King's House hearing about radicalization in the Muslim community.

Weeping and Other Hysterics: Have Muslim Apologists Nothing More to Offer? by Raymond Ibrahim 3/14/11

From Congressman Keith Ellison's emotional breakdown to Congresswoman Jackie Speier's accusations of "racism," last week's hearings on Muslim radicalization have made it clear that those who oppose the hearings have little of substance to offer. Still, the tactics used by such apologists—namely, appeals to emotionalism and accusations of racism—are influential enough that they need to be addressed and discredited once and for all.     . . .

Based on these initial hearings, it is clear that the apologists have little to offer. As Jennifer Rubin writes at the Washington Post, "The Democrats' unhinged rhetoric and wild accusations did more to undermine their opposition to the hearings than anything King could possibly have said." Yet crying tears or "racism!" is emblematic of a greater problem: politicians trying to appeal to the people's emotions, not their reason—an approach that has historically had horrific consequences.

Rep. Peter King committee witness, Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, distinguishes Islamism from Islam; presents spokes-alternative to Islamist advocates, CAIR, MPAC, & ISNA, for mainstream media

Rep. Peter King's opening statement at the House Homeland Security Committee on hearing on the extent of radicalization among American Muslims.

Dr. Zuhdi Jasser testified before the House Committee on Homeland Security about Muslim radicalization on Thursday, March 10th. He joined family members of American-Muslims seeking understanding for their children who have been radicalized into militancy by the radical wave dominating America's mosques. The panel was a textbook example of demagogue politicians seeking to curry influence for Muslim donations by obfuscating the hearing on radicalization with Islamophobic racism.



In this exclusive video interview with DemoCast.TV (recorded last month at the South Florida ACT! meeting with the Florida Security Council) Dr. Jasser challenges the mainstream media's acceptance of Islamism in America, such as Muslim-Brotherhood supported advocates CAIR, ISNA, and MPAC without ideological alternatives, available through the American Islamic Leadership Coalition.

Through his American Islamic Forum for Democracy ("A.I.F.D.") he exposes and challenges Saudi-Wahabism buying and dominating American mosques, moving American-Muslims towards Shariah political activism to conquer the West for Islam.

Dr. Jasser denounces those attempting to re-direct criticism of political Islamism as racism (such as CAIR, ISNA, and MPAC - as well as their advocates among the House Committee), explaining that "Islam-ism" must be distinguished as a political, not a religious, ideology intending to overtake civil law with Islamic religious law.

Neutralizing oil as an Islamist imperialist weapon over our culture- Jim Woolsey at PJTN symposium

Former C.I.A. Director James Woolsey addresses an audience at a screening of the Christian Zionist-advocacy group, Proclaiming Justice to the Nations, with the direct relationship between gas-consumption strenthening O.P.E.C.'s monopoly over western transportation, and Islamist influence through western politics and society, via the radicalization of western Muslims through Wahabist Saudi control in western mosques and madrasas.

Presented by Proclaiming Justice to the Nations, executive director, Laurie Cardoza Moore, in coordination with the 2011 National Religious Broadcasters convention in Nashville.