"DOJ targets political threats when REAL threats
abound" by Mike Huckabee 18 January '22
 |
Pakistani-Briton, Texas synagogue hostage-taker, Mr. Malik Faisal Akram (photo: Sky News)
|
A Dallas/Fort Worth-area rabbi and several others are taken
hostage by an armed Pakistani-born terrorist at Congregation
Beth Israel on Saturday 15 January. The terrorist reportedly wanted to
negotiate for the release of, well, another terrorist, dubbed
“Lady al-Qaeda,” who is serving more than 80 years
in prison in Fort Worth for trying to kill American soldiers in
Afghanistan. After more than 10 hours, the rabbi throws a chair
at the terrorist and enables the whole group to escape. An FBI
Hostage Rescue team finally closes in, and fortunately the
terrorist is the only one who ends up dead.
Rabbi Charlie Cytron-Walker, known to congregants as
“Rabbi Charlie,” is a hero; he credits training he
got from police and the FBI. As the hours ticked by, he knew
the terrorist was aware his negotiations were not getting him
what he wanted, and the situation was deteriorating. The
terrorist had become “belligerent and threatening,”
the rabbi says, and had said he expected to die. Rabbi Charlie
knew from his training that they had to get out of there
somehow. Here are the details of what happened inside that
synagogue.
https://nypost.com/2022/01/17/texas-rabbi-credits-security-training-for-hostage-survival/?utm_source=sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news_alert&utm_content=20220117&lctg=60c37da7dba83e59146f67bc&utm_term=NYP%20-%20News%20Alerts
Apparently, the armed man didn’t even have to sneak
into the synagogue. Rabbi Charlie had invited him in out of
kindness because he appeared to need shelter, and the rabbi
says he “didn’t hear anything suspicious” as
he brewed a cup of tea for his guest. But while they were
praying, he heard the click of the man’s gun.
Biden’s first reaction was a vapid claim that they
didn’t yet know the motives of the hostage-taker. But the
FBI later admitted the obvious and released a statement calling
the ordeal “a terrorism-related matter, in which the
Jewish community was targeted” and said the Joint
Terrorism Task Force is investigating.
Fine, but Miranda Devine --- writer for the New York Post
and author of LAPTOP FROM HELL --- says that “the attack
is a reminder of times in the not-so-distant past, when Islamic
terrorism was considered a far greater threat than a MAGA
supporter, and the national security apparatus was deployed to
protect American citizens, not attack them.” If the FBI
is busy chasing down conservative parents who protest at school
board meetings, for example, could it be that “the
organization has taken its eye off the infiltration into our
country of a terrorist like like Akram”? That sure would
explain a lot.
https://nypost.com/2022/01/17/why-was-the-dallas-terrorist-allowed-into-the-us/
Devine makes the point that Democrats are using the Capitol
Hill riot as a pretext for hunting their political enemies, not
the real threats. Her opinion piece on this is a
must-read:.
https://nypost.com/2022/01/16/dems-are-using-the-capitol-riot-to-hunt-political-foes/
So, tell me, FBI, how did this terrorist, the late,
not-so-great Malik Faisal Akram, from the U.K., manage to fly
into JFK Airport and then disappear into this country?
According to his brother, “He’s known to police.
Got a criminal record...was suffering from mental health
issues.” He had no apparent means of support. He listed a
hotel in Queens as his destination but traveled to Dallas,
where he stayed at a homeless shelter for a week and bought a
gun, apparently on the street.
A New York Post editorial put it this way: “American
travelers put up with a vast amount of security theater ---
millions of man-hours lost each year to unpredictably long TSA
lines; intrusive pat-downs; the whole
take-off-your-shoes-and-belt rigamarole. Yet the vast security
apparatus can’t screen out a mentally ill Muslim
extremist?” They’re right: This guy was such a
screwball, he made news in the U.K. for being banned from a
court after ranting about 9/11. We’re now hearing that he
was known to MI-5, the British counterpart to our FBI.
 |
Over-incarcerated, Jan 6,'21 Trump-rallyer's held as Democrats' political prisoners (collage: World Tribune) |
|
Meanwhile, our “Justice” Department has created
a “Sedition Task Force” to investigate Trump
supporters for attempting to “overthrow the
government” and has put Capitol Hill rally attendees on
no-fly lists. The government has set up a National Strategy for
Countering Domestic Terrorism. The national security apparatus
has been weaponized against conservatives. But, hey, welcome to
America, you disturbed, U.S.-hating Islamic terrorist!
https://nypost.com/2022/01/17/why-was-the-dallas-terrorist-allowed-into-the-us/
When DOJ resources are directed for political reasons to
what is wrongly labeled a domestic terrorist threat –-
such as conservatives daring to question the honesty of the
2020 election –- that means real threats like this Malik
Faisal Akram get to waltz right in.
The attorney general, to
please Democrats who accuse him of “inaction,”
bragged last week about the enormous array of resources
they’re devoting to their investigation of January 6, as
if Trump supporters were the worst threat to America since the
Civil War. (Actually, many leftists, the ones who watch too
much MSNBC, believe that.) Meanwhile, a rabbi and several in
his congregation came close to losing their lives.
https://thelibertydaily.com/why-did-the-fbi-ignore-a-known-terrorist-threat-while-focusing-on-arresting-maga-meemaws/
Steve Hilton, on this weekend’s “The Next
Revolution,” asked guest Tulsi Gabbard what she thought
of the deputy Attorney General’s condemnation of anyone
who is “anti-authority” for being part part of what
he calls domestic violent extremism. And I have to say that,
even though she’s in the Democrat Party for some
inexplicable reason, she gave an answer that made a lot of
sense --- an answer that one might even expect to hear from a
Republican.
“I think it’s really important to bold,
highlight and underline what he said,” she told him.
“...The authorities of the Biden administration are
targeting Americans for holding anti-authority views. That is
authoritarianism. And what does that mean to us, here at home?
We’re supposed to just sit back passively, follow along,
put those blinders on and do whatever they tell us to do? That
undermines the heart of our democratic republic, that
undermines the essence of our Constitution...”
“...This is where they’re exposing their
anti-liberty, anti-democracy mindset, which is so
dangerous.” (article continues below)