Showing posts with label political prisoners. Show all posts
Showing posts with label political prisoners. Show all posts

20250106

January 6th political-prisoner returns to L.A. rallies; Shares experience that mainstream media intentionally misrepresents

Manny Melo and Ed Badalian, who demonstrated at the US Capitol Bldg on
January 6th, 2021, reunited at a Beverly Hills Freedom Rally group march
around Westwood, Los Angeles on 
October 19, 2024. Mr. Badalian served
50 weeks in federal detention for entering the Capitol Building 
 
Our interview with a pair of participants at the January 6th, '21 D.C. Trump Rally sheds light on their perspectives and experiences, particularly focusing on claims of government overreach and the narrative surrounding the events of that day.

Voices from the Rally

Two weeks before the November 2024 election, members of the Beverly Hills Freedom Rally group, like Manny Mello (pictured here) 
reunited with group member, Ed Badalian, who then was recently  released from 50 weeks in federal incarceration.

Mr. Melo emphasizes his activism rooted in a desire to promote an "America First" message. He noted that, despite marching in a liberal area like Westwood, California, he and his fellow conservatives receive support from those who are often afraid to speak out. This sentiment reflects a broader struggle among conservatives in traditionally liberal regions, where expressing their views can lead to backlash. 

Edward Badalian shared his journey into activism, which began in 2018. He described how the COVID-19 pandemic led him to engage in rallies such as the Beverly Hills Freedom Rally. Badalian's narrative took a darker turn when he recounted being raided by the FBI on April 1, 2021, following his participation in the January 6th events. He claimed that he was treated harshly during this encounter, which he described as a form of punishment for his political beliefs. 


Government Overreach Allegations 

Both men expressed strong feelings about their treatment by law enforcement and the judicial system. Badalian detailed his experiences in various prisons, emphasizing what he described as abusive conditions and unjust treatment of January 6th participants. He argued that the charges brought against him were politically motivated and lacked substantial evidence. He also highlighted his belief that no one has been charged with insurrection because there was no legitimate basis for such claims. According to him, many participants were merely there to hear President Trump speak and did not intend to engage in violence or insurrection. 

Claims of Agitation by Outside Forces 

A significant part of their narrative revolves around the assertion that outside agitators, particularly Antifa members, infiltrated the rally to instigate violence. Badalian recounted an incident where he attempted to stop individuals from breaking windows, suggesting that these actions were not representative of the rally-goers' intentions. He claimed that many attendees were unarmed and were there peacefully, contrasting their behavior with those he identified as provocateurs.

 

Badalian's assertion that some individuals at the rally were paid agitators adds a layer of complexity to the ongoing debate about January 6th. He pointed to a specific incident where an individual admitted to being part of an organized effort to disrupt the event.

 
Manny Melo, Shiva Bagher of Bev Hills Freedom Rally and Ed








Conclusion

The interview reflects a deep-seated frustration among participants regarding how they perceive their actions have been mischaracterized by media narratives and government responses. They argue for recognition of their intentions as peaceful protesters rather than insurrectionists, while also calling attention to what they see as a pattern of government overreach and manipulation by outside forces during politically charged events. As discussions about January 6th continue, these voices underscore the ongoing divide in American political discourse and highlight concerns about civil liberties among conservative activists.

20220120

While genuine threats abound, why does Democrat D.o.J. divert towards 'Republican political threats'?

"DOJ targets political threats when REAL threats abound" by Mike Huckabee 18 January '22

Pakistani-Briton, Texas synagogue hostage-taker,
Mr. Malik Faisal Akram (photo: Sky News)

A Dallas/Fort Worth-area rabbi and several others are taken hostage by an armed Pakistani-born terrorist at Congregation Beth Israel on Saturday 15 January. The terrorist reportedly wanted to negotiate for the release of, well, another terrorist, dubbed “Lady al-Qaeda,” who is serving more than 80 years in prison in Fort Worth for trying to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan. After more than 10 hours, the rabbi throws a chair at the terrorist and enables the whole group to escape. An FBI Hostage Rescue team finally closes in, and fortunately the terrorist is the only one who ends up dead.

Rabbi Charlie Cytron-Walker, known to congregants as “Rabbi Charlie,” is a hero; he credits training he got from police and the FBI. As the hours ticked by, he knew the terrorist was aware his negotiations were not getting him what he wanted, and the situation was deteriorating. The terrorist had become “belligerent and threatening,” the rabbi says, and had said he expected to die. Rabbi Charlie knew from his training that they had to get out of there somehow. Here are the details of what happened inside that synagogue.

https://nypost.com/2022/01/17/texas-rabbi-credits-security-training-for-hostage-survival/?utm_source=sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news_alert&utm_content=20220117&lctg=60c37da7dba83e59146f67bc&utm_term=NYP%20-%20News%20Alerts

Apparently, the armed man didn’t even have to sneak into the synagogue. Rabbi Charlie had invited him in out of kindness because he appeared to need shelter, and the rabbi says he “didn’t hear anything suspicious” as he brewed a cup of tea for his guest. But while they were praying, he heard the click of the man’s gun.

Biden’s first reaction was a vapid claim that they didn’t yet know the motives of the hostage-taker. But the FBI later admitted the obvious and released a statement calling the ordeal “a terrorism-related matter, in which the Jewish community was targeted” and said the Joint Terrorism Task Force is investigating.

Fine, but Miranda Devine --- writer for the New York Post and author of LAPTOP FROM HELL --- says that “the attack is a reminder of times in the not-so-distant past, when Islamic terrorism was considered a far greater threat than a MAGA supporter, and the national security apparatus was deployed to protect American citizens, not attack them.” If the FBI is busy chasing down conservative parents who protest at school board meetings, for example, could it be that “the organization has taken its eye off the infiltration into our country of a terrorist like like Akram”? That sure would explain a lot.

https://nypost.com/2022/01/17/why-was-the-dallas-terrorist-allowed-into-the-us/

Devine makes the point that Democrats are using the Capitol Hill riot as a pretext for hunting their political enemies, not the real threats. Her opinion piece on this is a must-read:.

https://nypost.com/2022/01/16/dems-are-using-the-capitol-riot-to-hunt-political-foes/

So, tell me, FBI, how did this terrorist, the late, not-so-great Malik Faisal Akram, from the U.K., manage to fly into JFK Airport and then disappear into this country? According to his brother, “He’s known to police. Got a criminal record...was suffering from mental health issues.” He had no apparent means of support. He listed a hotel in Queens as his destination but traveled to Dallas, where he stayed at a homeless shelter for a week and bought a gun, apparently on the street.

A New York Post editorial put it this way: “American travelers put up with a vast amount of security theater --- millions of man-hours lost each year to unpredictably long TSA lines; intrusive pat-downs; the whole take-off-your-shoes-and-belt rigamarole. Yet the vast security apparatus can’t screen out a mentally ill Muslim extremist?” They’re right: This guy was such a screwball, he made news in the U.K. for being banned from a court after ranting about 9/11. We’re now hearing that he was known to MI-5, the British counterpart to our FBI.

Over-incarcerated, Jan 6,'21  Trump-rallyer's
held as Democrats' political prisoners
(collage: World Tribune)

Meanwhile, our “Justice” Department has created a “Sedition Task Force” to investigate Trump supporters for attempting to “overthrow the government” and has put Capitol Hill rally attendees on no-fly lists. The government has set up a National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism. The national security apparatus has been weaponized against conservatives. But, hey, welcome to America, you disturbed, U.S.-hating Islamic terrorist!

https://nypost.com/2022/01/17/why-was-the-dallas-terrorist-allowed-into-the-us/

When DOJ resources are directed for political reasons to what is wrongly labeled a domestic terrorist threat –- such as conservatives daring to question the honesty of the 2020 election –- that means real threats like this Malik Faisal Akram get to waltz right in. 

The attorney general, to please Democrats who accuse him of “inaction,” bragged last week about the enormous array of resources they’re devoting to their investigation of January 6, as if Trump supporters were the worst threat to America since the Civil War. (Actually, many leftists, the ones who watch too much MSNBC, believe that.) Meanwhile, a rabbi and several in his congregation came close to losing their lives.

https://thelibertydaily.com/why-did-the-fbi-ignore-a-known-terrorist-threat-while-focusing-on-arresting-maga-meemaws/

Steve Hilton, on this weekend’s “The Next Revolution,” asked guest Tulsi Gabbard what she thought of the deputy Attorney General’s condemnation of anyone who is “anti-authority” for being part part of what he calls domestic violent extremism. And I have to say that, even though she’s in the Democrat Party for some inexplicable reason, she gave an answer that made a lot of sense --- an answer that one might even expect to hear from a Republican.

“I think it’s really important to bold, highlight and underline what he said,” she told him. “...The authorities of the Biden administration are targeting Americans for holding anti-authority views. That is authoritarianism. And what does that mean to us, here at home? We’re supposed to just sit back passively, follow along, put those blinders on and do whatever they tell us to do? That undermines the heart of our democratic republic, that undermines the essence of our Constitution...”

“...This is where they’re exposing their anti-liberty, anti-democracy mindset, which is so dangerous.”   (article continues below)